UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) vs TITAN Xp

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 1030 GTX 1050 GTX 1050 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1070 GTX 1070 Ti GTX 1080 GTX 1080 Ti TITAN Xp
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
16EU Mobile 24EU 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 32EU 32EUs (Alder Lake) 48EU 64EU 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN Xp with UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake), including specs and performance data.

TITAN Xp
2017
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
46.35
+1267%

TITAN Xp outperforms UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) by a whopping 1267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking85756
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.40no data
Power efficiency14.12no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)no data
GPU code nameGP102no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 April 2017 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384032
Core clock speed1405 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate379.7no data
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs240no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5Xno data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1426 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD190−200
+1257%
14
−1257%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Sons of the Forest 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+0%
10
+0%
Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Sons of the Forest 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3
+0%
3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 9
+0%
9
+0%
Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+0%
7
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Sons of the Forest 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Sons of the Forest 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+0%
6
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Sons of the Forest 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Sons of the Forest 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how TITAN Xp and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) compete in popular games:

  • TITAN Xp is 1257% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 46.35 3.39

TITAN Xp has a 1267.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The TITAN Xp is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN Xp is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
vs
Iris Graphics 550 Iris Graphics 550
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
HD 7950 HD 7950
GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
HD 7950 HD 7950
GT 705 OEM GeForce GT 705 OEM
vs
HD 7470 OEM HD 7470 OEM
GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
vs
HD 6450 HD 6450
GT 1010 GeForce GT 1010
vs
HD 6990 HD 6990
Radeon 530 Radeon 530
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 3 GB
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 3 GB
GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 3 GB
vs
RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 3 GB
RX 560D Radeon RX 560D
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1060 6 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.1 4724 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 13 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN Xp or UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.