Radeon RX Vega M GL vs TITAN Xp

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN Xp with Radeon RX Vega M GL, including specs and performance data.

TITAN Xp
2017
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
43.93
+402%

TITAN Xp outperforms M GL by a whopping 402% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking91500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.67no data
Power efficiency14.1510.84
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP102Polaris 22
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 April 2017 (8 years ago)1 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401280
Core clock speed1405 MHz931 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1011 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate379.780.88
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPS2.588 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs24080
L1 Cache1.4 MB320 KB
L2 Cache3 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XHBM2
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed1426 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/s179.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN Xp 43.93
+402%
RX Vega M GL 8.75

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN Xp 19424
+402%
RX Vega M GL 3869
Samples: 298

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 17 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.93 8.75
Recency 6 April 2017 1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

TITAN Xp has a 402.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX Vega M GL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 284.6% lower power consumption.

The TITAN Xp is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN Xp is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 4728 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN Xp or Radeon RX Vega M GL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.