GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile vs TITAN Xp

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN Xp with GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

TITAN Xp
2017
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
43.47
+42.2%

TITAN Xp outperforms GTX 1080 Mobile by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking69150
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.4641.15
Power efficiency13.7516.12
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP102GP104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 April 2017 (7 years ago)15 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $499.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1080 Mobile has 230% better value for money than TITAN Xp.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402560
Core clock speed1405 MHz1607 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1771 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data94 °C
Texture fill rate379.7283.4
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPS9.068 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs240160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1426 MHz10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/s320 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data3.0
VR Readyno data+
Anselno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+39.1%
115
−39.1%
1440p100−110
+40.8%
71
−40.8%
4K75−80
+36.4%
55
−36.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.49
−72.4%
4.35
+72.4%
1440p11.99
−70.3%
7.04
+70.3%
4K15.99
−75.9%
9.09
+75.9%
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 72% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 70% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 76% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Battlefield 5 115
+0%
115
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Fortnite 143
+0%
143
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+0%
108
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 188
+0%
188
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Battlefield 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Fortnite 201
+0%
201
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 106
+0%
106
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+0%
119
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115
+0%
115
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+0%
142
+0%
Valorant 186
+0%
186
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Far Cry 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 102
+0%
102
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 91
+0%
91
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%
Valorant 137
+0%
137
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150
+0%
150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 183
+0%
183
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+0%
87
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 88
+0%
88
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 178
+0%
178
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+0%
61
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 33
+0%
33
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 42
+0%
42
+0%

This is how TITAN Xp and GTX 1080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • TITAN Xp is 39% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN Xp is 41% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN Xp is 36% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.47 30.57
Recency 6 April 2017 15 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

TITAN Xp has a 42.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1080 Mobile, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The TITAN Xp is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN Xp is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 4683 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 343 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN Xp or GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.