GeForce GT 1030 vs TITAN Xp

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN Xp and GeForce GT 1030, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN Xp
2017
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
50.51
+692%

TITAN Xp outperforms GT 1030 by a whopping 692% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking60577
Place by popularitynot in top-10033
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.732.31
Power efficiency13.9414.67
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP102GP108
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 April 2017 (7 years ago)17 May 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN Xp has 451% better value for money than GT 1030.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840384
Core clock speed1405 MHz1228 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate379.735.23
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPS1.127 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs24024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length267 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1426 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI++
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN Xp 50.51
+692%
GT 1030 6.38

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN Xp 19424
+692%
GT 1030 2453

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN Xp 72420
+638%
GT 1030 9807

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

TITAN Xp 86232
+804%
GT 1030 9541

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

TITAN Xp 58384
+466%
GT 1030 10307

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD190−200
+692%
24
−692%
1440p200−210
+669%
26
−669%
4K70−75
+678%
9
−678%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.31
−91.7%
3.29
+91.7%
1440p6.00
−97.3%
3.04
+97.3%
4K17.13
−95.1%
8.78
+95.1%
  • GT 1030 has 92% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GT 1030 has 97% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GT 1030 has 95% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Elden Ring 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 28
+0%
28
+0%
Metro Exodus 23
+0%
23
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Valorant 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Dota 2 19
+0%
19
+0%
Elden Ring 13
+0%
13
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 19
+0%
19
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+0%
29
+0%
Metro Exodus 14
+0%
14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 63
+0%
63
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 15
+0%
15
+0%
World of Tanks 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+0%
16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 19
+0%
19
+0%
Valorant 14
+0%
14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Elden Ring 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
World of Tanks 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 12
+0%
12
+0%
Elden Ring 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12
+0%
12
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+0%
12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 4
+0%
4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6
+0%
6
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how TITAN Xp and GT 1030 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN Xp is 692% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN Xp is 669% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN Xp is 678% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 50.51 6.38
Recency 6 April 2017 17 May 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 30 Watt

TITAN Xp has a 691.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 1030, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The TITAN Xp is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 1030 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 4672 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7995 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.