GeForce 8700M GT vs TITAN Xp

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking57not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.32no data
Power efficiency14.50no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP102G84
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 April 2017 (7 years ago)1 June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384032
Core clock speed1405 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt29 Watt
Texture fill rate379.710.00
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs24016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-HE
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount12 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1426 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.11.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN Xp 19424
+15565%
8700M GT 124

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 April 2017 1 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 29 Watt

TITAN Xp has an age advantage of 9 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

8700M GT, on the other hand, has 762.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN Xp and GeForce 8700M GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that TITAN Xp is a desktop card while GeForce 8700M GT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
GeForce 8700M GT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 4664 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 20 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.