UHD Graphics 770 vs TITAN V

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2
44.26
+622%

TITAN V outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 622% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking72547
Place by popularitynot in top-10020
Cost-effectiveness evaluation40.341.27
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Alder Lake
GPU code nameGV100Alder Lake xG
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2017 (6 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data
Current price$228 (0.1x MSRP)$878

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V has 3076% better value for money than UHD Graphics 770.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512032
Core clock speed1200 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1455 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate465.626.40
Floating-point performance14,899 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width3072 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1696 MHz1550 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA7.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.26
+622%
UHD Graphics 770 6.13

TITAN V outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 622% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN V 17125
+520%
UHD Graphics 770 2761

TITAN V outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 520% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+606%
17
−606%
1440p152
+624%
21−24
−624%
4K82
+531%
13
−531%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.26 6.13
Recency 7 December 2017 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3271 vote

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1025 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.