Radeon RX 6800 XT vs TITAN V

Place in performance ranking	70	24
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	40.25	28.12
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GV100	Navi 21
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 December 2017 (6 years ago)	18 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	$649
Current price	$228 (0.1x MSRP)	$696 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V has 43% better value for money than RX 6800 XT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	4608
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	648.0
Floating-point performance	14,899 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1696 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	7.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.35

RX 6800 XT 64.84
+46.2%

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms TITAN V by 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN V 17125

RX 6800 XT 25039
+46.2%

Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms TITAN V by 46% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	140−150 −47.1%	206 +47.1%
1440p	152 +10.1%	138 −10.1%
4K	82 −11%	91 +11%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

85−90
−47.1%

120−130

+47.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 −48.6%	100−110 +48.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −58%	158 +58%
Battlefield 5	140−150 −47.1%	200−210 +47.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −54.7%	110−120 +54.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 −47.1%	120−130 +47.1%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −53.3%	110−120 +53.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 −57%	150−160 +57%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −47.1%	200−210 +47.1%
Hitman 3	90−95 −46.7%	132 +46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	290−300 −49%	432 +49%
Metro Exodus	95−100 −51.6%	144 +51.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −52.5%	122 +52.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	270−280 −49.6%	404 +49.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −53.6%	169 +53.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 −48.6%	100−110 +48.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −50%	135 +50%
Battlefield 5	140−150 −47.1%	200−210 +47.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −54.7%	110−120 +54.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 −47.1%	120−130 +47.1%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −53.3%	110−120 +53.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 −57%	150−160 +57%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −47.1%	200−210 +47.1%
Hitman 3	45−50 −51.1%	68 +51.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 −51.7%	270−280 +51.7%
Metro Exodus	90−95 −48.9%	134 +48.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −51.3%	121 +51.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	240−250 −47.9%	355 +47.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	200−210 −47%	294 +47%
Watch Dogs: Legion	210−220 −47.1%	309 +47.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 −48.6%	100−110 +48.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80−85 −47.5%	118 +47.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 −54.7%	110−120 +54.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 −47.1%	120−130 +47.1%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −53.3%	110−120 +53.3%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −47.1%	200−210 +47.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 −46.8%	279 +46.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200−210 −51%	302 +51%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 −60%	160 +60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −49.3%	112 +49.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
−50%

120

+50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 −49%	140−150 +49%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −50.5%	143 +50.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −50%	75−80 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 −50.8%	98 +50.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −55.4%	100−110 +55.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −46.7%	65−70 +46.7%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −54.1%	131 +54.1%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −52%	150−160 +52%
Hitman 3	75−80 −52%	114 +52%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −53.6%	215 +53.6%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −49.3%	112 +49.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 −48%	222 +48%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 −52%	110−120 +52%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −54.5%	85 +54.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80
−54.7%

116

+54.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −56%	75−80 +56%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −60%	60−65 +60%
Hitman 3	35−40 −60%	55−60 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −49.2%	95−100 +49.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −60%	80 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 −46.7%	110 +46.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −48.6%	50−55 +48.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −62.5%	65 +62.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −56.7%	45−50 +56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −47.6%	30−35 +47.6%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −51.4%	100−110 +51.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −50.6%	128 +50.6%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −56.7%	94 +56.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −63.3%	49 +63.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

−52%

76
+52%

This is how TITAN V and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6800 XT is 47% faster in 1080p
TITAN V is 10% faster in 1440p
RX 6800 XT is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	44.35	64.84
Recency	7 December 2017	18 November 2020
Cost	$2999	$649
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	300 Watt