Radeon RX 5600 XT vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V and Radeon RX 5600 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN V
2017, $2,999
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
41.48
+27.8%

TITAN V outperforms 5600 XT by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking112192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.1139.13
Power efficiency12.6116.47
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGV100Navi 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2017 (8 years ago)21 January 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 5600 XT has 852% better value for money than TITAN V.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202304
Core clock speed1200 MHz1130 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6224.6
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS7.188 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs320144
Tensor Cores640no data
L1 Cache7.5 MBno data
L2 Cache4.5 MB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA7.0-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 41.48
+27.8%
RX 5600 XT 32.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+27.8%
Samples: 138
RX 5600 XT 13399
Samples: 4611

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+22.6%
106
−22.6%
1440p152
+145%
62
−145%
4K82
+128%
36
−128%

Cost per frame, $

1080p23.07
−776%
2.63
+776%
1440p19.73
−338%
4.50
+338%
4K36.57
−372%
7.75
+372%
  • RX 5600 XT has 776% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 5600 XT has 338% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 5600 XT has 372% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 320
+0%
320
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+0%
83
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 123
+0%
123
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 257
+0%
257
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
74
+0%
Far Cry 5 148
+0%
148
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 185
+0%
185
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 275
+0%
275
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 135
+0%
135
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+0%
63
+0%
Dota 2 185
+0%
185
+0%
Far Cry 5 135
+0%
135
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+0%
173
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 126
+0%
126
+0%
Metro Exodus 81
+0%
81
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140
+0%
140
+0%
Valorant 272
+0%
272
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Dota 2 168
+0%
168
+0%
Far Cry 5 126
+0%
126
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 138
+0%
138
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 148
+0%
148
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 80
+0%
80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 61
+0%
61
+0%
Metro Exodus 49
+0%
49
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 252
+0%
252
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 109
+0%
109
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 19
+0%
19
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 63
+0%
63
+0%
Metro Exodus 30
+0%
30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+0%
46
+0%
Valorant 214
+0%
214
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Dota 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70
+0%
70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how TITAN V and RX 5600 XT compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 23% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 145% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 128% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.48 32.45
Recency 7 December 2017 21 January 2020
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

TITAN V has a 28% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 5600 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 71% more advanced lithography process, and 67% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5600 XT in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3352 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3559 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or Radeon RX 5600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.