Radeon HD 6250 vs TITAN V

Place in the ranking	111	1443
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.10	no data
Power efficiency	12.61	0.89
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	GV100	Cedar
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 December 2017 (8 years ago)	31 January 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	80
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	21,100 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	19 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	5.200
Floating-point processing power	14.9 TFLOPS	0.104 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	4
TMUs	320	8
Tensor Cores	640	no data
L1 Cache	7.5 MB	16 KB
L2 Cache	4.5 MB	128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	168 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	848 MHz	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI	+	+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	7.0	-
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 40.95
+18514%

HD 6250 0.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+18118%

Samples: 138

HD 6250 94
Samples: 300

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1100−1150 +18233%	6 −18233%
1440p	152	0−1
4K	82	-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.73	no data
1440p	19.73	no data
4K	36.57	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

This is how TITAN V and HD 6250 compete in popular games:

TITAN V is 18233% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 26 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	40.95	0.22
Recency	7 December 2017	31 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	12 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	19 Watt

TITAN V has a 18514% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6250, on the other hand, has 1216% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6250 in performance tests.