Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
40.87

AI PRO R9700 outperforms TITAN V by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10917
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.27no data
Power efficiency12.4517.99
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGV100Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204096
Core clock speed1200 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6747.5
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs320256
Tensor Cores640128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB32 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA7.0-
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 40.87
AI PRO R9700 70.86
+73.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
AI PRO R9700 29693
+73.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1440p152
−71.1%
260−270
+71.1%
4K82
−70.7%
140−150
+70.7%

Cost per frame, $

1440p19.73no data
4K36.57no data

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.87 70.86
Recency 7 December 2017 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

TITAN V has 20% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 73.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the TITAN V in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3333 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.