Quadro P4000 vs TITAN V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with Quadro P4000, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.54
+47.5%

TITAN V outperforms P4000 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.58
Power efficiency12.2919.84
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGV100GP104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)6 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $815

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V and Quadro P4000 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201792
Core clock speed1200 MHz1202 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1480 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6165.8
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS5.304 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs320112
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1901 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s192 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
Display Portno data1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan++
CUDA7.06.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.54
+47.5%
Quadro P4000 30.20

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+47.5%
Quadro P4000 11613

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN V 156221
+275%
Quadro P4000 41669

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

TITAN V 150991
+257%
Quadro P4000 42316

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

TITAN V 179522
+365%
Quadro P4000 38590

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+44.9%
69
−44.9%
1440p152
+52%
100−110
−52%
4K82
+49.1%
55−60
−49.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p29.99
−154%
11.81
+154%
1440p19.73
−142%
8.15
+142%
4K36.57
−147%
14.82
+147%
  • Quadro P4000 has 154% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Quadro P4000 has 142% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Quadro P4000 has 147% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Elden Ring 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Elden Ring 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Elden Ring 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
World of Tanks 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Elden Ring 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how TITAN V and Quadro P4000 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 45% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 52% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 49% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.54 30.20
Recency 7 December 2017 6 February 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

TITAN V has a 47.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro P4000, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while Quadro P4000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3295 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 309 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.