GeForce GTX 1650 vs TITAN V

Place in performance ranking	71	253
Place by popularity	not in top-100	2
Value for money	40.38	19.04
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GV100	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 December 2017 (6 years ago)	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	$149
Current price	$228 (0.1x MSRP)	$185 (1.2x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V has 112% better value for money than GTX 1650.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	896
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	93.24
Floating-point performance	14,899 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	229 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1696 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	7.0	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.23
+117%

GTX 1650 20.35

TITAN V outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 117% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN V 17125
+117%

GTX 1650 7878

TITAN V outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 117% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

TITAN V 150662
+282%

GTX 1650 39403

TITAN V outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 282% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

TITAN V 147421
+305%

GTX 1650 36385

TITAN V outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 305% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Benchmark coverage: 4%

TITAN V 179522
+349%

GTX 1650 39941

TITAN V outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 349% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	150−160 +114%	70 −114%
1440p	152 +300%	38 −300%
4K	82 +257%	23 −257%

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	44.23	20.35
Recency	7 December 2017	23 April 2019
Cost	$2999	$149
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	75 Watt