GeForce GT 630M vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition Xavier
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
615 GT 415M GT 420M GT 425M GT 435M GT 520M GT 525M GT 540M GT 550M GT 620M GT 630M GT 640M LE

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with GeForce GT 630M, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017, $2,999
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
40.76
+3187%

TITAN V outperforms 630M by a whopping 3187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
TITAN V TITAN V
GT 630M GT 630M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1101078
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.12no data
Power efficiency12.572.90
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGV100GF108
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)22 March 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512096
Core clock speed1200 MHzUp to 800 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,100 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate465.610.56
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS0.2534 TFLOPS
ROPs964
TMUs32016
Tensor Cores640no data
L1 Cache7.5 MB128 KB
L2 Cache4.5 MB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB1 GB
Memory bus width3072 BitUp to 128bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/sUp to 32.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI++
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
DirectX 11.2no data12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA7.0+
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 40.76
+3187%
GT 630M 1.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+3193%
Samples: 122
GT 630M 520
Samples: 3209

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN V 154560
+6411%
GT 630M 2374

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p600−650
+3058%
19
−3058%
Full HD500−550
+3025%
16
−3025%
1440p152
+3700%
4−5
−3700%
4K82
+4000%
2−3
−4000%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.00no data
1440p19.73no data
4K36.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35
+0%
35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 23
+0%
23
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4
+0%
4
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how TITAN V and GT 630M compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 3058% faster in 900p
  • TITAN V is 3025% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 3700% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 4000% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 48 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 40.76 1.24
Recency 7 December 2017 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 33 Watt

TITAN V has a 3187.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

GT 630M, on the other hand, has 657.6% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630M in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 630M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GeForce GT 630M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 9060 Radeon RX 9060
GT 630M GeForce GT 630M
vs
HD Graphics 4400 HD Graphics 4400
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
ATI HD 3450 X2 Radeon HD 3450 X2
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
ATI HD 3450 X2 Radeon HD 3450 X2
vs
Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile RTX 4070 Mobile
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
vs
RTX 4070 Ti RTX 4070 Ti
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
HD 8670 OEM HD 8670 OEM
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
FX 4800 FX 4800
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Pro 5700 XT Pro 5700 XT
Tesla V100 SXM2 Tesla V100 SXM2
vs
RTX 3060 Max-Q RTX 3060 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3338 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1002 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or GeForce GT 630M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.