GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs TITAN V CEO Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 4050 Max-Q RTX 4050 Mobile RTX 4060 Max-Q RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Ti Mobile RTX 4070 Max-Q RTX 4070 Mobile RTX 4080 Mobile RTX 4090 Max-Q RTX 4090 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V CEO Edition with GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V CEO Edition
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.03
+17.6%

TITAN V CEO Edition outperforms RTX 4050 Mobile by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
RTX 4050 Mobile RTX 4050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking83123
Place by popularitynot in top-10044
Power efficiency12.2452.03
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGV100AD107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 June 2018 (6 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202560
Core clock speed1200 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6140.4
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs32080
Tensor Cores64080
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB6 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.08.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V CEO Edition 44.03
+17.6%
RTX 4050 Mobile 37.43

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V CEO Edition 16987
+17.6%
RTX 4050 Mobile 14439

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+14.6%
96
−14.6%
1440p55−60
+14.6%
48
−14.6%
4K35−40
+9.4%
32
−9.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 103
+0%
103
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 117
+0%
117
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+0%
83
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+0%
92
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 168
+0%
168
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
+0%
70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+0%
65
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 145
+0%
145
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80
+0%
80
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+0%
84
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+0%
59
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+0%
47
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+0%
53
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
+0%
26
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how TITAN V CEO Edition and RTX 4050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V CEO Edition is 15% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V CEO Edition is 15% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V CEO Edition is 9% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.03 37.43
Recency 21 June 2018 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

TITAN V CEO Edition has a 17.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4050 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V CEO Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V CEO Edition is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
TITAN V CEO Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
RTX 4050 Mobile GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
vs
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
GTX 980 Mobile GeForce GTX 980 Mobile
vs
Xbox XGPU-B Xbox XGPU B
R9 270 Radeon R9 270
vs
Quadro K420 Quadro K420
HD 7560D Radeon HD 7560D
vs
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
HD 8570 OEM Radeon HD 8570 OEM
vs
ATI X1900 GT Radeon X1900 GT
GTX 970M SLI GeForce GTX 970M SLI
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
R9 M290X Radeon R9 M290X
vs
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
ATI Mobility HD 3450 Mobility Radeon HD 3450
vs
FX Go 5200 GeForce FX Go 5200
HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
vs
GT 740M GeForce GT 740M
Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
vs
RTX 2060 Super GeForce RTX 2060 Super
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile UHD Graphics 630 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 20 votes

Rate TITAN V CEO Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2571 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.