Radeon RX 5900 XT vs TITAN RTX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking66not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.11no data
Power efficiency11.98no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU102Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 December 2018 (6 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46084352
Core clock speed1350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1735 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8471.9
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS15.1 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs288272
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 300 Watt

TITAN RTX has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

RX 5900 XT, on the other hand, has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between TITAN RTX and Radeon RX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
AMD Radeon RX 5900 XT
Radeon RX 5900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 813 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 67 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.