Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs TITAN RTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN RTX with Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), including specs and performance data.

TITAN RTX
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 280 Watt
48.89
+1006%

TITAN RTX outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 1006% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking63664
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.10no data
Power efficiency12.17no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU102Raphael
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 December 2018 (5 years ago)26 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608128
Core clock speed1350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Wattno data
Texture fill rate509.8no data
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs288no data
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount24 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 48.89
+1006%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 4.42

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

TITAN RTX 49602
+1539%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 3026

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

TITAN RTX 99561
+751%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 11703

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

TITAN RTX 35884
+1435%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 2338

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

TITAN RTX 177234
+1062%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 15247

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

TITAN RTX 537413
+237%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 159603

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD162
+853%
17
−853%
1440p99
+1138%
8−9
−1138%
4K73
+1117%
6−7
−1117%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.43no data
1440p25.24no data
4K34.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
+888%
8−9
−888%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+767%
12−14
−767%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 104
+2500%
4−5
−2500%
Battlefield 5 209
+1990%
10−11
−1990%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 143
+1330%
10−11
−1330%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+888%
8−9
−888%
Far Cry 5 127
+1311%
9−10
−1311%
Far Cry New Dawn 201
+1575%
12−14
−1575%
Forza Horizon 4 281
+981%
24−27
−981%
Hitman 3 117
+1070%
10−11
−1070%
Horizon Zero Dawn 348
+1100%
27−30
−1100%
Metro Exodus 144
+1500%
9−10
−1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 127
+1055%
10−12
−1055%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 206
+1188%
16−18
−1188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 215
+389%
40−45
−389%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 186
+1450%
12−14
−1450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
+2100%
4−5
−2100%
Battlefield 5 203
+1930%
10−11
−1930%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 131
+1210%
10−11
−1210%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+888%
8−9
−888%
Far Cry 5 101
+1022%
9−10
−1022%
Far Cry New Dawn 154
+1183%
12−14
−1183%
Forza Horizon 4 254
+877%
24−27
−877%
Hitman 3 116
+1060%
10−11
−1060%
Horizon Zero Dawn 336
+1059%
27−30
−1059%
Metro Exodus 144
+1500%
9−10
−1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110
+900%
10−12
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 286
+2500%
11
−2500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+494%
16−18
−494%
Watch Dogs: Legion 204
+364%
40−45
−364%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
+558%
12−14
−558%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+1900%
4−5
−1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 102
+920%
10−11
−920%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+875%
8−9
−875%
Far Cry 5 79
+778%
9−10
−778%
Forza Horizon 4 175
+573%
24−27
−573%
Hitman 3 111
+1010%
10−11
−1010%
Horizon Zero Dawn 218
+2322%
9
−2322%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 242
+2589%
9
−2589%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+718%
16−18
−718%
Watch Dogs: Legion 86
+95.5%
40−45
−95.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 123
+1018%
10−12
−1018%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+1125%
8−9
−1125%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+971%
7−8
−971%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+1250%
4−5
−1250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+1220%
5−6
−1220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
+1875%
4−5
−1875%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+3200%
2−3
−3200%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+1040%
5−6
−1040%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+3543%
7−8
−3543%
Hitman 3 100
+1011%
9−10
−1011%
Horizon Zero Dawn 168
+1580%
10−11
−1580%
Metro Exodus 114
+11300%
1−2
−11300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 183
+1044%
16−18
−1044%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+2467%
3−4
−2467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 205
+659%
27−30
−659%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+1388%
8−9
−1388%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 88
+2833%
3−4
−2833%
Far Cry New Dawn 67
+2133%
3−4
−2133%
Hitman 3 48 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 150
+7400%
2−3
−7400%
Metro Exodus 121
+12000%
1−2
−12000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
+1633%
3−4
−1633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50
+2400%
2−3
−2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 33 0−1
Far Cry 5 49
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+3700%
3−4
−3700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 109
+1111%
9−10
−1111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
+4200%
1−2
−4200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 74
+1380%
5−6
−1380%

This is how TITAN RTX and Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 853% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 1138% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 1117% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the TITAN RTX is 12000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, TITAN RTX surpassed Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.89 4.42
Recency 18 December 2018 26 September 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm

TITAN RTX has a 1006.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN RTX is a desktop card while Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 809 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 235 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.