Quadro 4100 vs TITAN RTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking95not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.29no data
Power efficiency12.40no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTU102GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 December 2018 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081344
Core clock speed1350 MHz797 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate509.889.26
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs9632
TMUs288112
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data
L1 Cache4.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm160 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount24 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1782 MBps
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s57.02 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.56.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.175
CUDA7.53.0
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 35 Watt

TITAN RTX has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro 4100, on the other hand, has 700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN RTX and Quadro 4100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that TITAN RTX is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 4100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 877 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN RTX or Quadro 4100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.