ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE vs TITAN RTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking95not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.29no data
Power efficiency12.40no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTU102RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 December 2018 (7 years ago)26 January 2004 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608no data
Core clock speed1350 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Wattno data
Texture fill rate509.81.000
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs964
TMUs2884
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data
L1 Cache4.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount24 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s2.624 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x VGA, 2x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 December 2018 26 January 2004
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm

TITAN RTX has an age advantage of 14 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between TITAN RTX and All-In-Wonder 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 876 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN RTX or All-In-Wonder 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.