RTX A4500 Mobile vs T600

Place in the ranking	335	82
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	28.65	21.76
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU117	GA104
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)	22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	5888
Core clock speed	735 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	1335 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	140 Watt
Texture fill rate	53.40	276.0
Floating-point processing power	1.709 TFLOPS	17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	96
TMUs	40	184
Tensor Cores	no data	184
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T600 14.51

RTX A4500 Mobile 38.56
+166%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T600 6484

RTX A4500 Mobile 17231
+166%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	54 −159%	140−150 +159%
1440p	23 −161%	60−65 +161%
4K	20 −150%	50−55 +150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	40−45 −207%	120−130 +207%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 −158%	230−240 +158%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −197%	95−100 +197%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	40−45 −207%	120−130 +207%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −104%	130−140 +104%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 −158%	230−240 +158%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −197%	95−100 +197%
Far Cry 5	46 −178%	120−130 +178%
Fortnite	85−90 −102%	170−180 +102%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −142%	160−170 +142%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −156%	120−130 +156%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −176%	160−170 +176%
Valorant	120−130 −88.1%	230−240 +88.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	40−45 −207%	120−130 +207%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −104%	130−140 +104%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 −158%	230−240 +158%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	200−210 −35%	270−280 +35%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −197%	95−100 +197%
Dota 2	121 −20.7%	140−150 +20.7%
Far Cry 5	42 −205%	120−130 +205%
Fortnite	85−90 −102%	170−180 +102%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −142%	160−170 +142%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −156%	120−130 +156%
Grand Theft Auto V	59 −127%	130−140 +127%
Metro Exodus	26 −285%	100−105 +285%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −176%	160−170 +176%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	48 −210%	140−150 +210%
Valorant	120−130 −88.1%	230−240 +88.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −104%	130−140 +104%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −197%	95−100 +197%
Dota 2	111 −31.5%	140−150 +31.5%
Far Cry 5	39 −228%	120−130 +228%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −142%	160−170 +142%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −176%	160−170 +176%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27 −452%	140−150 +452%
Valorant	120−130 −88.1%	230−240 +88.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

85−90

−102%

170−180
+102%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −255%	110−120 +255%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	110−120 −147%	280−290 +147%
Grand Theft Auto V	27 −215%	85−90 +215%
Metro Exodus	15 −313%	60−65 +313%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −14.4%	170−180 +14.4%
Valorant	150−160 −67.9%	260−270 +67.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −136%	100−110 +136%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%
Far Cry 5	26 −285%	100−105 +285%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −210%	120−130 +210%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −208%	80−85 +208%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

35−40

−217%

110−120
+217%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	12−14 −162%	30−35 +162%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Grand Theft Auto V	25 −268%	90−95 +268%
Metro Exodus	8 −375%	35−40 +375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 −319%	65−70 +319%
Valorant	85−90 −185%	250−260 +185%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −187%	65−70 +187%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
Dota 2	40 −190%	110−120 +190%
Far Cry 5	12 −367%	55−60 +367%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −189%	80−85 +189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −293%	55−60 +293%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

16−18

−250%

55−60
+250%

This is how T600 and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A4500 Mobile is 159% faster in 1080p
RTX A4500 Mobile is 161% faster in 1440p
RTX A4500 Mobile is 150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 452% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX A4500 Mobile surpassed T600 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.51	38.56
Recency	6 May 2021	22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	140 Watt

T600 has 250% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 165.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the T600 in performance tests.

Be aware that T600 is a workstation card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.