RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs T400 4 GB

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking425not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation8.70no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameTU117AD107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2021 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$216 no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843072
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2115 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate34.20203.0

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on T400 4 GB and RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.9

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 6 May 2021 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 50 Watt

We couldn't decide between T400 4 GB and RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that T400 4 GB is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T400 4 GB
T400 4 GB
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 50 votes

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 16 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.