Radeon RX 6900 vs T1200 Mobile

Place in the ranking	277	22
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.63	18.76
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	no data	Navi 21
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	28 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	4608
Core clock speed	855 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	2105 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)	255 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	606.2
Floating-point processing power	no data	19.4 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	64
TMUs	no data	288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 20.22

RX 6900 69.58
+244%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7771

RX 6900 26745
+244%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	59 −239%	200−210 +239%
1440p	33 −233%	110−120 +233%
4K	109 −221%	350−400 +221%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −233%	120−130 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −225%	130−140 +225%
Elden Ring	65−70 −238%	220−230 +238%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −244%	220−230 +244%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −233%	120−130 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 −224%	55−60 +224%
Forza Horizon 4	89 −237%	300−310 +237%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −233%	180−190 +233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −226%	150−160 +226%
Valorant	80−85 −241%	280−290 +241%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −244%	220−230 +244%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −233%	120−130 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 −221%	45−50 +221%
Dota 2	86 −237%	290−300 +237%
Elden Ring	65−70 −238%	220−230 +238%
Far Cry 5	67 −243%	230−240 +243%
Fortnite	100−110 −227%	350−400 +227%
Forza Horizon 4	73 −242%	250−260 +242%
Grand Theft Auto V	71 −238%	240−250 +238%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −233%	180−190 +233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −233%	450−500 +233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −226%	150−160 +226%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −244%	220−230 +244%
Valorant	80−85 −241%	280−290 +241%
World of Tanks	230−240 −243%	800−850 +243%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −244%	220−230 +244%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −233%	120−130 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 −218%	35−40 +218%
Dota 2	107 −227%	350−400 +227%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −243%	230−240 +243%
Forza Horizon 4	63 −233%	210−220 +233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −233%	450−500 +233%
Valorant	80−85 −241%	280−290 +241%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	37 −224%	120−130 +224%
Elden Ring	30−35 −224%	110−120 +224%
Grand Theft Auto V	37 −224%	120−130 +224%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −220%	550−600 +220%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −233%	60−65 +233%
World of Tanks	130−140 −228%	450−500 +228%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −241%	140−150 +241%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −244%	110−120 +244%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 −243%	24−27 +243%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −227%	180−190 +227%
Forza Horizon 4	47 −240%	160−170 +240%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −226%	150−160 +226%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −239%	95−100 +239%
Valorant	50−55 −227%	170−180 +227%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −224%	55−60 +224%
Dota 2	30−35 −224%	110−120 +224%
Elden Ring	14−16 −233%	50−55 +233%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −224%	110−120 +224%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −233%	50−55 +233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −228%	200−210 +228%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −208%	40−45 +208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −224%	110−120 +224%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −225%	65−70 +225%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −224%	55−60 +224%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Dota 2	109 −221%	350−400 +221%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −227%	85−90 +227%
Fortnite	24−27 −233%	80−85 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −233%	100−105 +233%
Valorant	24−27 −233%	80−85 +233%

This is how T1200 Mobile and RX 6900 compete in popular games:

RX 6900 is 239% faster in 1080p
RX 6900 is 233% faster in 1440p
RX 6900 is 221% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.22	69.58
Recency	12 April 2021	28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	255 Watt

T1200 Mobile has an age advantage of 5 months, and 168.4% lower power consumption.

RX 6900, on the other hand, has a 244.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6900 is our recommended choice as it beats the T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.