Quadro K2200M vs T1200 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	260	452
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	4.04
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	no data	GM107
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	19 July 2014 (9 years ago)
Current price	no data	$228

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	640
Core clock speed	855 MHz	667 MHz
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	26.68
Floating-point performance	no data	853.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on T1200 Mobile and Quadro K2200M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12
Shader Model	no data	5
OpenGL	no data	4.5
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	+
CUDA	no data	5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	59 +146%	24−27 −146%
1440p	34 +143%	14−16 −143%
4K	109 +142%	45−50 −142%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+129%

14−16

−129%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	47 +124%	21−24 −124%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +144%	27−30 −144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +129%	14−16 −129%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +156%	18−20 −156%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +128%	40−45 −128%
Hitman 3	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Horizon Zero Dawn	109 +142%	45−50 −142%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +144%	27−30 −144%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	89 +123%	40−45 −123%
Watch Dogs: Legion	54 +125%	24−27 −125%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	28 +133%	12−14 −133%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +144%	27−30 −144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +129%	14−16 −129%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +156%	18−20 −156%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +128%	40−45 −128%
Hitman 3	20 +150%	8−9 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +126%	35−40 −126%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +144%	27−30 −144%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	73 +143%	30−33 −143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 +137%	30−33 −137%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +150%	24−27 −150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 +133%	9−10 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +129%	14−16 −129%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +156%	18−20 −156%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +128%	40−45 −128%
Horizon Zero Dawn	63 +133%	27−30 −133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 +133%	27−30 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 +131%	16−18 −131%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 +138%	8−9 −138%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+129%

24−27

−129%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +138%	16−18 −138%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +150%	8−9 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 +125%	8−9 −125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Far Cry 5	41 +128%	18−20 −128%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Hitman 3	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45 +150%	18−20 −150%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +131%	16−18 −131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 +124%	21−24 −124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12 +140%	5−6 −140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+136%

14−16

−136%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +150%	8−9 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Hitman 3	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +144%	9−10 −144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +150%	8−9 −150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +144%	9−10 −144%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+143%

7−8
−143%

This is how T1200 Mobile and K2200M compete in popular games:

T1200 Mobile is 146% faster in 1080p
T1200 Mobile is 143% faster in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 142% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.97	8.98
Recency	12 April 2021	19 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt