GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with GeForce GTX 560 Ti, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
20.21
+154%

T1200 Mobile outperforms GTX 560 Ti by a whopping 154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking276521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.82
Power efficiency14.643.22
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameno dataGF114
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)25 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024384
Core clock speed855 MHz823 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)170 Watt
Texture fill rateno data52.67
Floating-point processing powerno data1.263 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 20.21
+154%
GTX 560 Ti 7.96

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7769
+154%
GTX 560 Ti 3059

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1200 Mobile 14387
+259%
GTX 560 Ti 4013

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T1200 Mobile 44135
+185%
GTX 560 Ti 15494

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1200 Mobile 10134
+192%
GTX 560 Ti 3470

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p150−160
+138%
63
−138%
Full HD59
−6.8%
63
+6.8%
1440p33
+175%
12−14
−175%
4K109
+173%
40−45
−173%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.95
1440pno data20.75
4Kno data6.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+125%
16−18
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Elden Ring 60−65
+191%
21−24
−191%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+146%
24−27
−146%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+125%
16−18
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 89
+178%
30−35
−178%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+109%
21−24
−109%
Valorant 80−85
+204%
27−30
−204%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+146%
24−27
−146%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+125%
16−18
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Dota 2 86
+207%
27−30
−207%
Elden Ring 60−65
+191%
21−24
−191%
Far Cry 5 67
+97.1%
30−35
−97.1%
Fortnite 100−110
+128%
45−50
−128%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+128%
30−35
−128%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+154%
27−30
−154%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+111%
60−65
−111%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+109%
21−24
−109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Valorant 80−85
+204%
27−30
−204%
World of Tanks 230−240
+94.2%
120−130
−94.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+146%
24−27
−146%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+125%
16−18
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Dota 2 107
+282%
27−30
−282%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+97.1%
30−35
−97.1%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+96.9%
30−35
−96.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+111%
60−65
−111%
Valorant 80−85
+204%
27−30
−204%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
+311%
9−10
−311%
Elden Ring 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+311%
9−10
−311%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+330%
40−45
−330%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
World of Tanks 130−140
+136%
55−60
−136%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+224%
16−18
−224%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+194%
16−18
−194%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+254%
12−14
−254%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Valorant 50−55
+160%
20−22
−160%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Dota 2 30−35
+78.9%
18−20
−78.9%
Elden Ring 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+165%
21−24
−165%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 109
+474%
18−20
−474%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%
Fortnite 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Valorant 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%

This is how T1200 Mobile and GTX 560 Ti compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 138% faster in 900p
  • GTX 560 Ti is 7% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 175% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 173% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 750% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 560 Ti is 45% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • GTX 560 Ti is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.21 7.96
Recency 12 April 2021 25 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 170 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 153.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 78.9% lower power consumption.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 831 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.