GeForce 810A vs T1200 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with GeForce 810A, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
18.74
+1094%

T1200 Mobile outperforms 810A by a whopping 1094% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3251003
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.178.05
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameno dataGK208
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (4 years ago)22 July 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024192
Core clock speed855 MHz719 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz758 MHz
Number of transistorsno data915 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.13
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2911 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T1200 Mobile 18.74
+1094%
GeForce 810A 1.57

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7835
+1096%
Samples: 1053
GeForce 810A 655
Samples: 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+1375%
4−5
−1375%
1440p33
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
4K90
+1186%
7−8
−1186%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+1100%
9−10
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
+1217%
6−7
−1217%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+1100%
9−10
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Far Cry 5 65
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Fortnite 100−110
+1163%
8−9
−1163%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+1183%
6−7
−1183%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+1100%
5−6
−1100%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+1117%
6−7
−1117%
Valorant 140−150
+1100%
12−14
−1100%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
+1217%
6−7
−1217%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+1100%
9−10
−1100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+1183%
18−20
−1183%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Dota 2 114
+1167%
9−10
−1167%
Far Cry 5 59
+1375%
4−5
−1375%
Fortnite 100−110
+1163%
8−9
−1163%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+1183%
6−7
−1183%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+1100%
5−6
−1100%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+1320%
5−6
−1320%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+1117%
6−7
−1117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+1320%
5−6
−1320%
Valorant 140−150
+1100%
12−14
−1100%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+1217%
6−7
−1217%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Dota 2 107
+1238%
8−9
−1238%
Far Cry 5 56
+1300%
4−5
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+1183%
6−7
−1183%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+1117%
6−7
−1117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Valorant 140−150
+1100%
12−14
−1100%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+1163%
8−9
−1163%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+1280%
10−11
−1280%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1121%
14−16
−1121%
Valorant 170−180
+1179%
14−16
−1179%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+1250%
4−5
−1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Far Cry 5 41
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Valorant 100−110
+1111%
9−10
−1111%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Dota 2 109
+1111%
9−10
−1111%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

This is how T1200 Mobile and GeForce 810A compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 1375% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 1550% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 1186% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.74 1.57
Recency 12 April 2021 22 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 1093.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 810A, on the other hand, has 533.3% lower power consumption.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 810A in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 810A is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 810A
GeForce 810A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 10 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 15 votes

Rate GeForce 810A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about T1200 Mobile or GeForce 810A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.