GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Riva TNT2

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Riva TNT2 and GeForce RTX 4090 D, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Riva TNT2
1999
16 MB SDR
0.01

RTX 4090 D outperforms Riva TNT2 by a whopping 916900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.26
Power efficiencyno data14.78
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV5AD102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 1999 (25 years ago)28 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data14592
Core clock speed125 MHz2280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors15 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data425 Watt
Texture fill rate0.251,149
Floating-point processing powerno data73.54 TFLOPS
ROPs2176
TMUs2456
Tensor Coresno data456
Ray Tracing Coresno data114

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount16 MB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed150 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.4 GB/s1,008 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Riva TNT2 0.01
RTX 4090 D 91.70
+916900%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Riva TNT2 3
RTX 4090 D 35333
+1177667%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 91.70
Recency 12 October 1999 28 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 5 nm

RTX 4090 D has a 916900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 24 years, a 153500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Riva TNT2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva TNT2
Riva TNT2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
GeForce RTX 4090 D

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 17 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 91 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.