Radeon RX Vega 2 vs ATI Rage PRO Turbo AGP
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Rage 3 (1997−1998) | Vega (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | Rage PRO Turbo | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 March 1997 (28 years ago) | 7 January 2018 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 75 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1100 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 8 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 350 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.08 | no data |
| ROPs | 1 | no data |
| TMUs | 1 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 1x | no data |
| Length | 150 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | SDR | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 75 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 600.0 MB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x VGA | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 6.0 | 12_1 |
| OpenGL | 1.1 | no data |
| OpenCL | N/A | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 March 1997 | 7 January 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 350 nm | 12 nm |
RX Vega 2 has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 2816.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Rage PRO Turbo AGP and Radeon RX Vega 2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Rage PRO Turbo AGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 2 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
