ATI Rage PRO Turbo AGP vs Radeon RX Vega 3
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 850 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 94 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 14.10 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Rage 3 (1997−1998) |
| GPU code name | Picasso | Rage PRO Turbo |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 January 2019 (7 years ago) | 1 March 1997 (28 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 75 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1001 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | 8 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 350 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 12.01 | 0.08 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.3844 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 1 |
| TMUs | 12 | 1 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | AGP 1x |
| Length | no data | 150 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | SDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 75 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 600.0 MB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 6.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2019 | 1 March 1997 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 350 nm |
RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 21 years, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and Rage PRO Turbo AGP. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook graphics card while Rage PRO Turbo AGP is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
