Radeon 780M vs ATI Rage Fury

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated301
Place by popularitynot in top-10049
Power efficiencyno data83.69
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRage 4Hawx Point
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 August 1999 (25 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed80 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2700 MHz
Number of transistors8 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.16129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed120 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth960.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 1999 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 250 nm 4 nm

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 24 years, and a 6150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage Fury and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage Fury is a desktop card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage Fury
Rage Fury
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5
3 votes

Rate Rage Fury on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2
1532 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.