Radeon Pro W5500X vs ATI Rage 128 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.03
Power efficiencyno data10.83
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRage 4Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 August 1999 (26 years ago)11 December 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed119 MHz1187 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1757 MHz
Number of transistors8 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data125 Watt
Texture fill rate0.24168.7
Floating-point processing powerno data5.398 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs296
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed119 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth952.0 MB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA2x HDMI 2.0b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 1999 11 December 2019
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 7 nm

Pro W5500X has an age advantage of 20 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage 128 Ultra and Radeon Pro W5500X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage 128 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W5500X is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Rage 128 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Rage 128 Ultra or Radeon Pro W5500X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.