Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs ATI Xpress 200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Xpress 200M with Radeon RX 7900 GRE, including specs and performance data.

ATI Xpress 200M
2005
0.05

7900 GRE outperforms 200M by a whopping 130460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking154730
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.08
Power efficiencyno data19.33
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameRC410Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2005 (21 years ago)27 July 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores65120
Core clock speed336 MHz1287 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHz2245 MHz
Number of transistors107 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data260 Watt
Texture fill rate0.67718.4
Floating-point processing powerno data45.98 TFLOPS
ROPs2160
TMUs2320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80
L0 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Xpress 200M 0.05
RX 7900 GRE 65.28
+130460%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Xpress 200M 22
Samples: 25
RX 7900 GRE 27404
+124464%
Samples: 1998

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1206
1440p-0−1129
4K-0−177

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.67
1440pno data4.26
4Kno data7.13

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 208

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 184
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−12950%
260−270
+12950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2800%
170−180
+2800%
Valorant 24−27
−1458%
350−400
+1458%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−3000%
270−280
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 158
Dota 2 7−8
−129900%
9100−9150
+129900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−12950%
260−270
+12950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2800%
170−180
+2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−9450%
382
+9450%
Valorant 24−27
−1458%
350−400
+1458%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 148
Dota 2 7−8
−129900%
9100−9150
+129900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−12950%
260−270
+12950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2800%
170−180
+2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−5125%
209
+5125%
Valorant 24−27
−1458%
350−400
+1458%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−10050%
200−210
+10050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−17400%
170−180
+17400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−22400%
220−230
+22400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−15500%
156
+15500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−979%
151
+979%
Valorant 0−1 300−350

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−9500%
95−100
+9500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−7800%
75−80
+7800%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 234
+0%
234
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 174
+0%
174
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 168
+0%
168
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 164
+0%
164
+0%
Metro Exodus 179
+0%
179
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Far Cry 5 155
+0%
155
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130
+0%
130
+0%
Metro Exodus 111
+0%
111
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+0%
98
+0%
Far Cry 5 154
+0%
154
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 125
+0%
125
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 GRE is 22400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7900 GRE performs better in 19 tests (37%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (63%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.05 65.28
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

RX 7900 GRE has a 130460% higher aggregate performance score, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 200M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 200M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 47 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1233 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 200M or Radeon RX 7900 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.