Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs ATI Xpress 200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1541not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRC410Pitcairn
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2005 (20 years ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61024
Core clock speed336 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors107 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate0.6759.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.894 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs264
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data153.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm

R9 270 1024SP has a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 200M and Radeon R9 270 1024SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 200M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 270 1024SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Radeon Xpress 200M
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 200M or Radeon R9 270 1024SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.