FirePro S7150 x2 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGMA 600Tonga
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2010 (15 years ago)1 February 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores41792 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz920 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data265 Watt
Texture fill rateno data103.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.297 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data32 ×2
TMUsno data112 ×2
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB ×2
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2010 1 February 2016
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm

S7150 x2 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 and FirePro S7150 x2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S7150 x2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
AMD FirePro S7150 x2
FirePro S7150 x2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 x2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 or FirePro S7150 x2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.