Radeon R4 Graphics vs ATI Xpress 200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1547not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRC410Beema
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2005 (21 years ago)11 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6128
Core clock speed336 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHzno data
Number of transistors107 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.676.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2048 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm

R4 Graphics has a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 200M and Radeon R4 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 200M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R4 Graphics is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 47 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 1460 votes

Rate Radeon R4 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 200M or Radeon R4 Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.