Radeon HD 8530M vs ATI Xpress 200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1547not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRC410Mars
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2005 (21 years ago)10 January 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6320
Core clock speed336 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors107 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate0.6711.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs216
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm

HD 8530M has a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 200M and Radeon HD 8530M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 47 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 200M or Radeon HD 8530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.