GeForce3 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 200M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Xpress 200M with GeForce3, including specs and performance data.

ATI Xpress 200M
2005
0.05
+400%

ATI Xpress 200M outperforms GeForce3 by a whopping 400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14931533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300 (2005−2008)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameRC410NV20 A5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2005 (20 years ago)27 February 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6no data
Core clock speed336 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHzno data
Number of transistors107 million57 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate0.671.600
ROPs24
TMUs28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Lengthno data165 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared230 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.68 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)8.0
OpenGL2.01.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Xpress 200M 0.05
+400%
GeForce3 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Xpress 200M 22
+450%
GeForce3 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Valorant 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Valorant 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.05 0.01
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm

ATI Xpress 200M has a 400% higher aggregate performance score, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Xpress 200M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 200M is a notebook card while GeForce3 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Radeon Xpress 200M
NVIDIA GeForce3
GeForce3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 43 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 54 votes

Rate GeForce3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 200M or GeForce3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.