Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs ATI Xpress 1250
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Xpress 1250 with Radeon RX 7900 XTX, including specs and performance data.
RX 7900 XTX outperforms ATI Xpress 1250 by a whopping 78456% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1499 | 16 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 56 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 42.93 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 16.02 |
| Architecture | R400 (2004−2008) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025) |
| GPU code name | RS690 | Navi 31 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 February 2007 (18 years ago) | 3 November 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 6144 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1929 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | 2498 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 120 million | 57,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 355 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.600 | 959.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 61.39 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 192 |
| TMUs | 4 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 96 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 6 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 96 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 287 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 960.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0b (9_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 240 |
| 1440p | -0−1 | 159 |
| 4K | -0−1 | 100 |
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 4.16 |
| 1440p | no data | 6.28 |
| 4K | no data | 9.99 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−24900%
|
250
+24900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−4260%
|
218
+4260%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−23900%
|
240
+23900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−11167%
|
338
+11167%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−3620%
|
186
+3620%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2400%
|
170−180
+2400%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−1821%
|
450−500
+1821%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−11
−2680%
|
270−280
+2680%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−21600%
|
217
+21600%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−2363%
|
197
+2363%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−10900%
|
330
+10900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−3160%
|
163
+3160%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2400%
|
170−180
+2400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−10800%
|
545
+10800%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−1821%
|
450−500
+1821%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−20600%
|
207
+20600%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−2125%
|
178
+2125%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−9733%
|
295
+9733%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−3020%
|
156
+3020%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2400%
|
170−180
+2400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−5860%
|
298
+5860%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−1821%
|
450−500
+1821%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−13250%
|
267
+13250%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−17400%
|
170−180
+17400%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−28900%
|
290
+28900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 238 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−1140%
|
186
+1140%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−32900%
|
300−350
+32900%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−9500%
|
95−100
+9500%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 1−2
−7800%
|
75−80
+7800%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 355
+0%
|
355
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 348
+0%
|
348
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 212
+0%
|
212
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 269
+0%
|
269
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 339
+0%
|
339
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 205
+0%
|
205
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 254
+0%
|
254
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 175
+0%
|
175
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 239
+0%
|
239
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 189
+0%
|
189
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 500−550
+0%
|
500−550
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 165
+0%
|
165
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 161
+0%
|
161
+0%
|
| Valorant | 450−500
+0%
|
450−500
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 146
+0%
|
146
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 187
+0%
|
187
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 128
+0%
|
128
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 67
+0%
|
67
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 108
+0%
|
108
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 197
+0%
|
197
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 43
+0%
|
43
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 73
+0%
|
73
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 159
+0%
|
159
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 159
+0%
|
159
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 227
+0%
|
227
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 69
+0%
|
69
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7900 XTX is 32900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 7900 XTX performs better in 29 tests (45%)
- there's a draw in 36 tests (55%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.09 | 70.70 |
| Recency | 28 February 2007 | 3 November 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 5 nm |
RX 7900 XTX has a 78455.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 1250 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1250 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
