UHD Graphics vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Xpress 1100 with UHD Graphics, including specs and performance data.

ATI Xpress 1100
2007
0.08

UHD Graphics outperforms ATI Xpress 1100 by a whopping 5913% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1479621
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Power efficiencyno data38.15
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRC410Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 October 2007 (17 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6256
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz750 MHz
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rate0.612.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Xpress 1100 0.08
UHD Graphics 4.81
+5913%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Xpress 1100 34
UHD Graphics 2151
+6226%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−5733%
350−400
+5733%
Valorant 24−27
−5733%
1400−1450
+5733%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−5900%
600−650
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Dota 2 8−9
−5525%
450−500
+5525%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−5733%
350−400
+5733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−5900%
180−190
+5900%
Valorant 24−27
−5733%
1400−1450
+5733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Dota 2 8−9
−5525%
450−500
+5525%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−5733%
350−400
+5733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−5900%
180−190
+5900%
Valorant 24−27
−5733%
1400−1450
+5733%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−5900%
900−950
+5900%
Valorant 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.08 4.81
Recency 17 October 2007 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics has a 5912.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 1100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1100 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 1100
Radeon Xpress 1100
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 29 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7382 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1100 or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.