Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 vs ATI X800

#ad 
Buy
All-In-Wonder X800 GT All-In-Wonder X800 XL Radeon X800 Radeon X800 GTO AGP Radeon X800 XL Radeon X800 XL AGP
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X800 with Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, including specs and performance data.

ATI X800
2004
256 MB DDR, 30 Watt
0.19

RX Vega M GL / 870 outperforms ATI X800 by a whopping 6153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

ATI X800 Radeon X800
RX Vega M GL / 870 RX Vega M GL / 870

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1396390
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.5014.50
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR430Vega Kaby Lake-G
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2004 (20 years ago)7 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1280
Core clock speed400 MHz931 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1011 MHz
Number of transistors160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800no data
ROPs12no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed350 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12_1
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−143
1440p-0−128
4K-0−114

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Battlefield 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Fortnite 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 24
+0%
24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+0%
41
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+0%
24
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 38
+0%
38
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 14
+0%
14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
+0%
24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+0%
29
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
+0%
9
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.19 11.88
Recency 1 October 2004 7 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 65 Watt

ATI X800 has 116.7% lower power consumption.

RX Vega M GL / 870, on the other hand, has a 6152.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X800 is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

ATI Radeon X800
Radeon X800
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI X800 Radeon X800
vs
7500 LE GeForce 7500 LE
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
ATI X800 Radeon X800
vs
ATI X1300 PRO Radeon X1300 PRO
ATI X550 ATI Radeon X550
vs
ATI 9550 SE Radeon 9550 SE
ATI X550 ATI Radeon X550
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 8 GB
ATI X700 SE ATI Radeon X700 SE
vs
Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB AGX Orin 32 GB
ATI X850 XT Platinum ATI Radeon X850 XT Platinum
vs
RTX 4050 Mobile RTX 4050 Mobile
ATI X800 XL ATI Radeon X800 XL
vs
GMA 3150 GMA 3150
ATI X800 ATI Radeon X800
vs
R7 M260DX R7 M260DX
ATI X800 ATI Radeon X800
vs
RX 640 RX 640
ATI All-In-Wonder X800 GT ATI All In-Wonder X800 GT
vs
RX 6750 GRE RX 6750 GRE
ATI X300 LE ATI Radeon X300 LE
vs
RTX 4090 Ti RTX 4090 Ti
ATI X600 ATI Radeon X600
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4250 IGP Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 38 votes

Rate Radeon X800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 118 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 or Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.