RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X800 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X800 XT with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

ATI X800 XT
2004
256 MB GDDR3, 54 Watt
0.23

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms X800 XT by a whopping 21413% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking142970
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.3354.37
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameR423AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 December 2004 (20 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed500 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors160 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000299.5
Floating-point processing powerno data19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI X800 XT 0.23
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 49.48
+21413%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X800 XT 97
Samples: 9
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20706
+21246%
Samples: 150

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 49.48
Recency 1 December 2004 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 70 Watt

ATI X800 XT has 29.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 21413% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X800 XT is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 XT
Radeon X800 XT
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Radeon X800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 58 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 XT or RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.