RTX A2000 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X800 GTO with RTX A2000, including specs and performance data.

ATI X800 GTO
2007
128 MB DDR, 49 Watt
0.30

RTX A2000 outperforms ATI X800 GTO by a whopping 11760% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1328138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data85.89
Power efficiencyno data35.43
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameR423GA106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 December 2007 (16 years ago)10 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3328
Core clock speed400 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors160 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800124.8
Floating-point processing powerno data7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs1248
TMUs12104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI X800 GTO 0.30
RTX A2000 35.58
+11760%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X800 GTO 114
RTX A2000 13725
+11939%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−196
1440p-0−144
4K-0−131

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.68
1440pno data10.20
4Kno data14.48

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 35.58
Recency 29 December 2007 10 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 70 Watt

ATI X800 GTO has 42.9% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000, on the other hand, has a 11760% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 GTO in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X800 GTO is a desktop card while RTX A2000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 GTO
Radeon X800 GTO
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 31 vote

Rate Radeon X800 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 565 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.