RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X700 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X700 SE with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

ATI X700 SE
2005
128 MB DDR
0.17

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms X700 SE by a whopping 33688% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking146748
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.92
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV410AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2005 (20 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed400 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors120 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600417.6
Floating-point processing powerno data26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI X700 SE 0.17
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 57.44
+33688%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X700 SE 71
Samples: 9
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24035
+33752%
Samples: 690

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 57.44
Recency 1 April 2005 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 33688.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 15900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X700 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X700 SE is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X700 SE
Radeon X700 SE
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 10 votes

Rate Radeon X700 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 65 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X700 SE or RTX 4000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.