RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Radeon X600

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X600 with RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI X600
2004
256 MB DDR, 36 Watt
0.12

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms X600 by a whopping 43783% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking150165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.2636.73
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV370AD104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7424
Core clock speed400 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors107 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)36 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600386.3
Floating-point processing powerno data24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs4232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cacheno data7.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI X600 0.12
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 52.66
+43783%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X600 49
Samples: 6
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 22035
+44869%
Samples: 358

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.12 52.66
Recency 1 September 2004 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 36 Watt 110 Watt

ATI X600 has 205.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 43783.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X600 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X600
Radeon X600
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate Radeon X600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 32 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X600 or RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.