GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon X1650 GTO with GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX 5060 Mobile outperforms ATI X1650 GTO by a whopping 25812% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1444 | 95 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 74.42 |
| Architecture | R500 (2005−2007) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | RV530 | GB206 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 December 2007 (17 years ago) | 20 May 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 3328 |
| Core clock speed | 587 MHz | 952 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1455 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 157 million | 21,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 45 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.348 | 151.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 9.684 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 48 |
| TMUs | 4 | 104 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 104 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 26 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 392 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.54 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 75 |
| 1440p | -0−1 | 50 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 44.05 |
| Recency | 2 December 2007 | 20 May 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
RTX 5060 Mobile has a 25811.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 GTO in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon X1650 GTO is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
