RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X1600 XT with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

ATI X1600 XT
2007
256 MB GDDR3, 42 Watt
0.30

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms ATI X1600 XT by a whopping 17893% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking132848
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.4952.84
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV530AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed590 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors157 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)42 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate2.360299.5
Floating-point processing powerno data19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs4192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed690 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.08 GB/s280.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI X1600 XT 0.30
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 53.98
+17893%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X1600 XT 115
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20796
+17983%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 53.98
Recency 1 October 2007 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 42 Watt 70 Watt

ATI X1600 XT has 66.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 17893.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X1600 XT is a desktop card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1600 XT
Radeon X1600 XT
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 42 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.