GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs ATI Radeon X1300
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon X1300 with GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, including specs and performance data.
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB outperforms ATI X1300 by a whopping 8014% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1466 | 439 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.49 |
| Architecture | R500 (2005−2007) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | RV515 | GP107 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 December 2005 (19 years ago) | 1 February 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1366 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1442 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 107 million | 3,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.800 | 69.22 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 2.215 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 24 |
| TMUs | 4 | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 250 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB/s | 84.1 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.14 | 11.36 |
| Recency | 1 December 2005 | 1 February 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 3 GB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB has a 8014.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon X1300 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
