GeForce MX250 vs ATI Radeon X1300 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated573
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data43.28
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRV515GP108B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2005 (19 years ago)20 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed600 MHz937 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1038 MHz
Number of transistors107 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40024.91
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7972 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X1300 PRO 84
GeForce MX250 2411
+2770%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 20 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 10 Watt

GeForce MX250 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 210% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1300 PRO and GeForce MX250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1300 PRO is a desktop card while GeForce MX250 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
Radeon X1300 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GeForce MX250

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 33 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1538 votes

Rate GeForce MX250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.