ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v vs Vega Frontier Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Vega Frontier Edition with Mobility Radeon HD 545v, including specs and performance data.

Vega Frontier Edition
2017, $999
16 GB HBM2, 300 Watt
30.31
+8319%

Frontier Edition outperforms Mobility HD 545v by a whopping 8319% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2051339
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.89no data
Power efficiency7.781.85
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameVega 10M93
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)5 May 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409680
Core clock speed1382 MHz680 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate409.65.440
Floating-point processing power13.11 TFLOPS0.1088 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs2568
L1 Cache1 MB16 KB
L2 Cache4 MB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB512 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz750 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s12 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 27 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.31 0.36
Recency 27 June 2017 5 May 2010
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 15 Watt

Vega Frontier Edition has a 8319% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 545v, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 545v in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 545v is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 29 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 25 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 545v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega Frontier Edition or Mobility Radeon HD 545v, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.