Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Instinct MI25 Radeon Pro V320 Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU Radeon Pro V340 Radeon Pro V340 8 GB Radeon Pro V340 16 GB Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU Radeon Pro WX 8100 Radeon Pro WX 8200 Radeon PRO WX 9100 Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Vega Frontier Edition with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, including specs and performance data.

Vega Frontier Edition
2017
16 GB HBM2, 300 Watt
30.88
+267%

Vega Frontier Edition outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by a whopping 267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Vega Frontier Edition Vega Frontier Edition
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking174493
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.11no data
Power efficiency7.6422.28
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409696
Core clock speed1382 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate409.6no data
Floating-point processing power13.11 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs256no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed945 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
+252%
27
−252%
1440p55−60
+267%
15
−267%
4K40−45
+233%
12
−233%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.52no data
1440p18.16no data
4K24.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 28
+0%
28
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Fortnite 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16
+0%
16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 124
+0%
124
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 51
+0%
51
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Fortnite 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+0%
17
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 112
+0%
112
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Dota 2 47
+0%
47
+0%
Far Cry 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8
+0%
8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 23
+0%
23
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 15
+0%
15
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+0%
7
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8
+0%
8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+0%
12
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Vega Frontier Edition and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

  • Vega Frontier Edition is 252% faster in 1080p
  • Vega Frontier Edition is 267% faster in 1440p
  • Vega Frontier Edition is 233% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.88 8.41
Recency 27 June 2017 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 28 Watt

Vega Frontier Edition has a 267.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 971.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
HD 7970M Radeon HD 7970M
Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
vs
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
P4000 Max-Q NVIDIA P4000 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1070 Max-Q 1070 Max-Q
RX 6900 AMD RX 6900
vs
GTX 1070 Max-Q 1070 Max-Q
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh NVIDIA 3050 Max-Q Refresh
vs
GTX 1070 Max-Q 1070 Max-Q
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB NVIDIA 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB
vs
GTX 1070 Max-Q 1070 Max-Q
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
vs
Vega Frontier Edition Frontier Edition
HD Graphics 615 HD Graphics 615
vs
Pro 560 560
GTX 1660 Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile NVIDIA 3080 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
RTX 4070 Mobile NVIDIA 4070 Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Intel Xe Graphics G7 80EU
vs
PRO WX 2100 WX 2100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 29 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1016 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega Frontier Edition or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.