FirePro D700 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and FirePro D700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Frontier Edition outperforms D700 by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 205 | 427 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.89 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.78 | 3.62 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | Vega 10 | Tahiti |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 June 2017 (8 years ago) | 18 January 2014 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1382 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 12,500 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 409.6 | 108.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 13.11 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 32 |
| TMUs | 256 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 768 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 279 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 945 MHz | 1370 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | 263.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.125 | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 30.31 | 12.89 |
| Recency | 27 June 2017 | 18 January 2014 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 274 Watt |
Vega Frontier Edition has a 135% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
FirePro D700, on the other hand, has 9% lower power consumption.
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D700 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
