Quadro FX 570 vs Radeon Vega 9 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiencyno data1.23
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePicassoG84
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)12 September 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores57616
Core clock speed300 MHz460 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt38 Watt
Texture fill rate46.803.680
Floating-point processing power1.498 TFLOPS0.02944 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs368
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 12 September 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 38 Watt

Vega 9 Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 153.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 9 Mobile and Quadro FX 570. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 9 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 570 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 9 Mobile
Radeon Vega 9 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
Quadro FX 570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 9 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 16 votes

Rate Quadro FX 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 9 Mobile or Quadro FX 570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.